“No one has ever doubted that truth and politics are on rather bad terms”—Hannah Arendt
There is something deeply unsettling about the fate of whistleblowers. We celebrate them after the event, build laws around their courage, occasionally name institutions after them and describe them as guardians of public interest. Yet when they actually stand up, documents in hand, against an employer, a government department, a corporation or some other concentration of power, they are frequently left terribly alone.
History contains enough proven murders of whistleblowers to make the danger real. It also contains deaths officially classified as suicide or accident but surrounded by circumstances that have left families and the public asking questions for decades. Intellectual honesty requires us not to convert suspicion into fact. However, intellectual honesty also requires us not to dismiss the larger pattern merely because every individual death cannot be proved to have resulted from assassination. The more important question is this: Why does truth become dangerous when it threatens power?
Whistleblowers are rarely a conventional adversary. They do not arrive carrying weapons. They may be accountants, engineers, civil servants, scientists or employees sitting quietly inside an organisation. What makes such persons dangerous is knowledge. The whistleblower knows where the papers are, who signed them, which figures do not reconcile, which safety warning was ignored, which payment...
You don't have permission to access "http://www.wltx.com/article/news/local/insurance-fraud-investigation-south-carolina-sled/101-bcab3639-c001-419a-b312-1a252d5721c5" on this server. Reference #1...