Donald Trump speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas, Texas, August 6, 2022.
Brian Snyder | Reuters
A federal judge on Monday rejected former President Donald Trump’s argument that he has “absolute immunity” in response to a lawsuit alleging he committed civil rights violations in his attempts to challenge the 2020 presidential election results.
The lawsuit, filed by the NAACP, the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization and others, accuses the former president and the Republican National Committee of efforts to disenfranchise voters through targeted harassment, intimidation and efforts to prevent the complete counting and certification of ballots after the 2020 election.
The ruling notes that Trump’s lawyers previously argued that he is “absolutely immune” from damages for his actions within the “outer perimeter” of his official responsibilities as president.
More from NBC News:
GOP criticism of Trump builds after his dinner with white supremacist
White House further condemns Trump’s dinner with Ye and Fuentes
Trump team does damage control after he dines with white supremacist
Washington, D.C., District Judge Emmet Sullivan sided with the civil rights groups, writing that Trump’s conduct after the 2020 election was “purely political and therefore well beyond the contours of presidential immunity.”
“If former President Trump disrupted the certification of the electoral vote count, as plaintiffs allege here, such actions would not constitute...
Welcome to Reality Check, NewsGuard’s nonpartisan newsletter that tracks the false claims and conspiracy theories that shape our world — and who’s behind them. Please support us by becoming a premi...