A federal appellate judge is the latest member of the judiciary to criticize the U.S. Supreme Court’s 52-year-old burden-shifting test for analyzing employment discrimination claims, urging the justices to clarify the framework or scrap it entirely.
Already a part of the community? Sign In Now.
Is one article a month not enough? Subscribe today to unlock premium access to all the in-depth analysis and breaking news on critical legal issues from Law.com.
*May exclude premium content.
"Indeed, there are many other causes of action—breach of contract, business torts, fraud, negligence, and so on—that provide a remedy for employers when employees grossly transgress computer-use policies. The CFAA is the wrong tool for NRA’s project. With today’s holding, we mean to turn future litigants to other causes of action so that we do not make 'millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens [into] criminals,'" Judge Thomas L. Ambro said.
“While the Justices were careful to say that they ‘d[id] not ultimately decide’ the issue, their stay order reinforces our...
Russian propaganda is spreading false statements that the account of the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Kyrylo Budanov, was allegedly created with...