Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has revealed how an intelligence officer and other analysts were pressured to say that Donald Trump benefited from Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
“I was pressured to alter my views,” the whistleblower, who was the deputy national intelligence officer for the National Intelligence Council, said in documents recently made public by Ms. Gabbard.
The senior intelligence analyst said her supervisor pressed her to change her analysis in a 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that concluded “foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”
The intelligence official said her agreement on a different ICA conclusion was needed to get the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to sign off on a modified assessment.
A new ICA, which came out in 2017 after Mr. Trump won the election, was based on the now-debunked dossier compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele and paid for by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The dossier linked Mr. Trump to the Kremlin, including salacious stories about Mr. Trump in Moscow.
The supervisor wanted the ICA to make that connection.
“Isn’t it possible Putin has something on Trump, to blackmail and coerce him?” the supervisor asked. “You need to TRUST ME on this.”
When she would not sign off on the new assessment, the supervisor appeared “visibly frustrated,” according to the whistleblower, and said, “I...
This roundup of claims has been compiled by Full Fact, the UK’s largest fact checking charity working to find, expose and counter the harms of bad information. The AI overviews of searches with Go...