A former DOJ lawyer revealed that investigations into antisemitism in universities during the Trump administration were flawed, with predetermined outcomes and procedural irregularities. Allegations of anti-Muslim bias were disregarded by leadership. Rights advocates have noted concerns over due process and free speech throughout these investigations.

• A former DOJ attorney has alleged that the Trump administration's investigations into university antisemitism were predetermined and lacked evidence.
• The whistleblower complaint, made public by Rep. Jamie Raskin, highlights procedural irregularities in the investigations.
• Haley Van Erem suggested investigating anti-Muslim bias on campuses, but the leadership did not pursue these proposals.
• The government's actions included threats of funding suspensions over pro-Palestinian protests, with some universities feeling intimidated by the probes.

A former Department of Justice attorney has raised serious allegations about the Trump administration's investigations into universities over accusations of antisemitism. According to the whistleblower complaint, these probes were predetermined, lacked evidence, and showcased procedural irregularities. The complaint has been made public by U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin.

The former attorney, Haley Van Erem, suggested investigating anti-Muslim bias on campuses as well, but leadership did not pursue these proposals. The Trump administration targeted universities with potential funding...

Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiywFBVV95cUxPSVBuTmtaVU8weTVaWDJpN19L...