The Disclosure reveals “grave concerns” about the USPS’s planned ballot mail processes, providing the Justices with critical information that “the administration has hidden the high likelihood that the new ballot mail verification processes will result in major disruptions in mail ballots ever getting delivered to voters.”
WASHINGTON, D.C., September 9, 2026 – WhistleblowerAid.org filed an amicus brief in United States Postal Service, et al., v. State of California et al., urging the U.S. Supreme Court to keep in place a preliminary injunction against the new United States Postal Service (USPS) rule, Ballot Mail for Federal Elections. The amicus brief provides the court with critical facts from the shocking disclosure by an anonymous WhistleblowerAid.org client, which became public last week.
The whistleblower disclosed to members of Congress and the USPS Office of Inspector General details of the “USPS’s secretive, rushed, chaotic, and fundamentally flawed process for the creation and implementation of an entirely new and untested set of IT systems [that] will govern the delivery of ballots to voters as soon as the 2026 mid-term federal elections and beyond.” Soon thereafter, Judge Indira Talwani of the District of Massachusetts, permanently enjoined the USPS from implementing its new vote-by-mail system for the 2026 election, agreeing that the new process could disenfranchise millions of voters. Information the whistleblower brought forward played an important part in...
In a 2017 piece in The New York Times, voting expert Ari Berman wrote, “The Voting Rights Act of 1965 outlawed tactics that prevented blacks, Hispanics and other minority groups from voting. But fo...