• Kioni said the evidence was only made available to them in recent days as the process of retrieving and analysing the data from IEBC servers took time.
• He further explained that a whistleblower only exposes the rot after it has already happened and not before things have gone wrong.
Azimio has explained why it failed to include the whistleblower's alleged evidence in the Supreme Court petition as part of the proof that Raila Odinga won the August 9 polls.
Kioni said the evidence was only made available to them in recent days as the process of retrieving and analysing the data from IEBC servers took time.
He further explained that a whistleblower only exposes the rot after it has already happened and not before things have gone wrong.
"The time you are supposed to file the report in court and the time the judgment is supposed to be given by the Supreme Court the time is so short," Kioni said interview on Tuesday
The Revised Supreme Court Presidential Election Petition Rules 2017 require petitioners in a presidential election to file their case and evidence in court within seven days after the poll results are announced.
Respondents are within four days of service of the petition required to file and serve their response after which the Supreme Court is supposed to hear and deliver its verdict within 14 days from the day the petition was filed.
"The time is so short that there is no sensible whistleblower who can give you anything tangible. They know something wrong has...
You don't have permission to access "http://www.marketscreener.com/news/ibma-s-17-million-dei-settlement-a-watershed-moment-for-false-claims-act-enforcement-ce7f59ddd989f021" on this server. Refer...