In a filing Monday, the whistleblowers said they don’t expect the settlement to move forward, and asked the court to reactivate the case, which is pending in the state’s highest appellate court.
They’re asking the case return to a lower court for trial.
“It’s possible they could still fund the settlement, but we’ve been given zero indication that that’s likely to happen, and we’re ready to go back to our trial court and get a judgment that holds Ken Paxton to justice,” said Blake Brickman, one of the whistleblowers who sued the office.
The lawsuit was central to Paxton’s impeachment and subsequent acquittal.
Paxton was accused of misusing his office to benefit Austin real estate developer and political donor Nate Paul. Impeachment managers and their attorneys argued Paxton gave Paul special legal attention and help while accepting home renovations and a job for a woman with whom he was having an affair. Paxton denied wrongdoing.
The House Committee on General Investigating began its probe into the...
The agitation over the NEET paper leak case continues at Jantar Mantar in Delhi, where protesters are demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. On July 20, proteste...