The 9th Circuit clarifies that prior media reports and earlier lawsuits won't automatically block whistleblower claims unless they reveal the same critical facts firsthand.
Hon. Stephen Kaus (Ret.) is a JAMS mediator and arbitrator with more than 50 years of legal experience, including 12 years as a judge on the Alameda County Superior Court. Before joining the bench, he practiced civil litigation, handling complex commercial, employment, insurance and professional liability matters. He now focuses on resolving complex disputes through mediation and arbitration, drawing on his extensive courtroom and settlement experience.
What lawyer, or prospective lawyer, has not dreamed for at least a moment of the riches to be earned by representing a whistleblower under the federal False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729. In September, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, consistently with other courts, confirmed that the road to a substantial recovery for an FCA or qui tam action is less rocky than one might think.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Nauman denies assaulting Yasmeen Bibi, alleges conspiracy and partial video manipulation Nauman, the prime accused in a case involving the alleged torture of a domestic worker in Buffer Zone, has c...