A whistleblower failed to show he should get another chance to argue Amazon.com violated the False Claims Act by working with foreign companies to import fur products into the US without paying proper fees and tariffs, the Second Circuit said Wednesday.
A New York federal district court properly concluded that the whistleblower didn’t sufficiently allege Amazon had knowledge of foreign manufacturers’ false claims, Judge José A. Cabranes of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said in an opinion to affirm dismissal.
The whistleblower’s complaint didn’t identify anyone at Amazon that consciously acknowledged the existence of false information ...
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
As the long tail of the 2020 presidential election continues to reverberate through Wisconsin politics, a bipartisan pair of former elected officials sought to deliver a message of trust Tuesday i...