In a class action complaint filed in the US District Court in Northern California, Bondi Sands is accused of mislabelling several sunscreen products available in the US as “reef friendly” while they contain chemical filters, such as avobenzone, homoslate, octisalate, and/or octocrylene, which according to the plaintiff “are not safe for reefs” [Moran v. Bondi Sands (U.S.) Inc., 21-cv-07961-JSW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2022)] [1].
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, which revealed the case, other sunscreen makers, including Banana Boat and Edgewell Personal Care [2], are facing similar complaints.
In response to questions from the Australian newspaper, Bondi Sands said their “sunscreen products are made in Australia and are compliant with TGA regulations, which are the strongest SPF guidelines in the world, and are compliant with strict EU and FDA laws.”
On their website, the Melbourne-headquartered company now provides a definition of what does “Reef Friendly” mean according to them: the absence of oxybenzone [3] and octinoxate [4].
“It’s important to know that the term “Reef Friendly” is not defined or regulated by authorities, so when you see these words on Bondi Sands sunscreens, it simply means that our entire suncare range has been formulated in compliance with Hawaii’s regulations and is free of oxybenzone and octinoxate. We will continue to evolve our product formulations based on guidance from both local and international...
Welcome to Reality Check, NewsGuard’s nonpartisan newsletter that tracks the false claims and conspiracy theories that shape our world — and who’s behind them. Please support us by becoming a premi...