The District of Columbia is entitled to summary judgment on a Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs employee’s First Amendment retaliation claim, a federal district court in the District of Columbia ruled. The employee alleged that she was placed on an eight-day suspension in retaliation for reporting her belief that a coworker committed benefits fraud and ethics violations. The court found that she spoke on a matter of public concern but the First Amendment interest in her speech was limited, because it took on the character of a personal grievance over time. The court also noted that her suspension was ...
To read the full article log in.
Eddie Hearn says that he has it in writing that the UFC will not be producing Tyson Fury vs Anthony Joshua in December. This is despite Dana White’s latest claim that he is still promoting the eve...