Protective Life Insurance’s lawsuit asserting claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment against a former employee who was overpaid $73,752.64 at termination because of a typo wasn’t barred by the two-year statute of limitations in § 6-2-38 (m), Ala. Code 1975, where that statute didn’t apply to Protective’s case seeking to recover unearned money that was paid to the employee due to a clerical error, because the amount wasn’t “wages” provided for by law, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled.
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.
Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiWmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5ibG9vbWJlcmdsYXcu...
A La Habra-based provider of positron emission tomography scan services has agreed to pay more than $8.3 million to resolve allegations it violated the False Claims Act by offering improper payment...