Regardless of whether the employer and employee have an arbitration agreement, California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing is not required to arbitrate a dispute if it did not agree to do so, a recent ruling said.
In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al., Cisco Systems, Inc. hired a man as an engineer and required him to sign an arbitration agreement. The agreement covered all employment-related disputes, including discrimination, retaliation and harassment claims.
The employee filed a complaint before the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. He alleged that the company discriminated against him because of ancestry or race, that two supervisors denied him opportunities and disparaged him because under India’s traditional caste system he was from the lowest caste while they were from the highest, and that the employer retaliated when he complained about receiving unfavorable treatment due to his caste.
The Department filed a lawsuit against the company and the two supervisors. It alleged numerous violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and requested punitive damages and compensation for the employee’s past and future economic losses.
The Department asked the Santa Clara County Superior Court for orders to prevent the employer from committing further violations and to require it to implement anti-employment discrimination policies. The employee was not a party to the lawsuit.
The company filed a motion to...
Russian propaganda has intensified its disinformation campaign surrounding the tragedy in Bucha, targeting a Western audience. In this way, the enemy is attempting to divert the international comm...