I always tell clients it is not enough to “merely” comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act on wage-hour issues. I always tell them that they must comply with State law, which may (often) be stricter than the federal law and if they do not, and are sued in a State court, compliance with federal law will not help them as a defense. A recent example in Pennsylvania proves this point dramatically.
In this regard, the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry (“DOL”) amended the wage-hour regulations to modify the manner of overtime calculation for non-exempt salaried employees. I often advise clients to place such employees on the Fluctuating Work Week (“FWW”) method of overtime payment because that reduces the employer’s overtime exposure. Now, Pennsylvania has done away with that option.
The regulatory change has altered the manner in which the “regular rate,” which overtime is based upon, is calculated. The modification mandates that the weekly compensation (salary, bonuses, commissions, etc) be divided by forty (40) instead of utilizing the FWW method of computing regular rate, which divides total compensation by the total hours worked in that week, rather than the generic forty. That FWW calculation will always produce a lower regular rate than dividing by the magical forty. The forty-hour regular rate then is multiplied by the traditional time-and-one-half which produces a much higher amount of overtime due for that week.
The Takeaway
This regulation is an apt...
Irvine, CA (PinionNewswire) — Powerful congressional candidate–and complex litigation attorney–Eric J. Troutman is raising concerns about an organization seemingly tricking consumers and voters int...