When the watchdog goes quiet, what happens next isn't what employees expect
A federal court has shut the door on a former contractor employee's bid to force the EPA's watchdog to act on his whistleblower complaint.
In a ruling dated May 22, 2026, the US District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed Floret Ikome's lawsuit against Sean W. O'Donnell, the Inspector General of the Environmental Protection Agency. It closes the latest chapter in a dispute that began in 2017.
Ikome worked for CSRA, LLC, a federal contractor doing business with the EPA. After he was removed from his job, he sued CSRA, alleging race and national origin discrimination and retaliation.
The District Court for the District of Maryland granted partial summary judgment to CSRA, and a jury sided with the company on the remaining claims.
While that first case was still running, Ikome filed a whistleblower complaint with the EPA's Inspector General. He alleged CSRA fired him because he reported the company's misconduct in its dealings with the EPA.
The federal contractor whistleblower statute, 41 U.S.C. § 4712, gives an Inspector General 180 days to investigate and report. The Inspector General asked Ikome for a 180-day extension, and Ikome agreed.
The extended deadline passed without a report. According to the opinion, staff from the Inspector General's office told Ikome the office was still investigating, and he sat for interviews and provided information over the course of nearly two years. No...
A British woman who accused a banker of rape in Hong Kong has been jailed for six years for blackmail and perverting the course of public justice. Isabel Rose, a 26-year-old events manager from so...