×
Saturday, May 23, 2026

Employment – Anti-raiding provision – Restrictive covenant - Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Where a plaintiff who used to work for the defendant has requested declaratory relief regarding the anti-raiding provision in his non-competition and non-solicitation agreement, that request should be granted because the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that he has no further obligations under the anti-raiding provision.

“Defendant Scott Wilson, formerly the Vice President of Finance for Plaintiff, LogicManager, Inc. (‘LogicManager’), signed at the start of his employment a Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement (‘Agreement’), which imposed a number of restrictions ‘for a period of one-year after the termination or cessation’ of Wilson’s employment. …

“In its First Amended Verified Complaint (‘AVC’), LogicManager alleges that Wilson resigned on August 20, 2021 and subsequently commenced employment with Lux Research. … The AVC does not allege that Lux Research competes with LogicManager. The AVC alleges on information and belief that in January, June, and November of 2022, Wilson posted or caused to be posted public statements on the Glassdoor website that made false and disparaging comments about LogicManager and its chief executive officer, Steve Minsky, in violation of the Agreement’s non-disparagement provision. … It further alleges on information and belief that Wilson solicited two LogicManager employees, Sarah Barucci and Cait McCarthy, to terminate their employment with LogicManager on October 12 and 17, 2022, respectively, in violation of the...



Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiYGh0dHBzOi8vbWFzc2xhd3llcnN3ZWVrbHku...