The internet is full of people promising effortless tax refunds. For many, the business model is simple: invent expenses, file claims at volume, and take a cut. These “refund factories” exploit HMRC’s “process now, check later” systems, operating largely out of sight – but at a scale that may represent a material slice of the UK’s 47bn tax gap.
It is rare to see exactly how these schemes operate. Usually they remain hidden from view until a tax tribunal decision exposes what was done and how the claims were fabricated.
Until recently, the most notorious example was Apostle Accounting Ltd, the failed firm run by high-profile adviser Zoe Goodchild. A Tribunal last year found that Apostle had deliberately submitted a false tax return – and that Goodchild had reported her client to the police when he complained. This was no isolated incident – it’s been reported that Apostle made more than 800 false returns, shielded by vexatious criminal complaints.
A reported case1 last week reveals another firm submitting fake tax refund claims – Oxford-based Welcome Accountancy.2
The current regulatory framework is visibly failing to stop firms like Welcome and Apostle. While new rules coming into force this year are intended to curb the abuse, there is a real risk they will miss the mark – imposing administrative burdens on normal advisers, while the fraudsters simply find a new workaround. We believe a better answer is aggressive enforcement, and the use of the criminal law. Bad actors...
A nursing home run by the family of Kim Keon-hee lost the first trial in a lawsuit seeking to cancel the National Health Insurance Service's disposition to claw back about 1.4 billion won in long-...