In early 2026, two stories began to circulate, separate at first, unconnected on the surface.
One looked back. It followed a case that had already moved through the U.S. courts, revisiting the path of a Chinese student who entered the country on a visa and later admitted to acting at the direction of China’s intelligence services.
The other moved in the present tense. It came from within a Chinese immigrant community in New York, where a whistleblower described quiet pressure, monitoring, and influence tied to organizations linked to Beijing.
Set side by side, the distance between them narrowed.
What emerged was not a single operation, but a pattern, one that has become increasingly visible to investigators and policymakers. Different methods, different timelines, but a similar logic running through both.
Ji Chaoqun’s story did not begin in secrecy.
In 2013, as he approached graduation from Beihang University in Beijing, he attended what appeared to be an ordinary campus recruitment event. The man who approached him introduced himself as a professor. There was nothing, at first glance, to distinguish the encounter from any other.
Only later did its significance become clear. Investigators would link the recruiter to China’s Ministry of State Security, the country’s main civilian intelligence agency.
Ji was taken to Nanjing. There, he signed a classified agreement committing himself to national security work. The language was formal. The implications were not.
What...
Punjab BJP president Sunil Jakhar on Sunday criticised Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, saying if the CM now claims that there is no shortage of oil and gas in Punjab, then why a resolution was passe...