Justice Department lawyers defending the Trump administration’s policies are encountering mounting criticism and frustration from federal judges, a sign of deepening tension between the executive branch and courts weighing its aggressive uses of power.
Sign up for Fact Checker, our weekly review of what's true, false or in-between in politics.
In recent hearings and rulings, judges appointed by presidents of both parties have criticized the statements and behavior of administration officials, accusing them of defying court orders, submitting flimsy evidence, providing inadequate answers to questions and even acting like toddlers.
What readers are saying
The comments reflect a strong skepticism and criticism towards the Trump administration's legal team, particularly focusing on Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Many commenters express concern over the administration's perceived incompetence, lack of integrity, and... Show more
This summary is AI-generated. AI can make mistakes and this summary is not a replacement for reading the comments.
Fact Check Fact Check From misinformation around the current military escalations between Israel and Iran to false claims of Air India plane crash survivor Vishwash Kumar Ramesh being arrested on s...