The trial in the Bommeleeër II case, concerning alleged false statements, did not conclude on Thursday as anticipated. The proceedings are now scheduled to wrap up on 1 December.
The delay occurred after the lawyers for civil parties Marc Scheer and Jos Wilmes delivered their closing arguments, prompting rebuttals from the defendants' legal counsel.
During their closing arguments, lawyers Thierry Hirsch and Max Lehnen detailed the statements they allege were false. They argued that these testimonies caused their clients to wait 12 years for the conclusion of the original Bommeleeër trial, which was suspended in 2014 with Scheer and Wilmes as the primary defendants.
Consequently, the lawyers are seeking 600,000 in damages for each client, plus 70,000 each for legal costs.
The defendants' lawyers countered that the contested statements, regardless of their accuracy, had no impact on Scheer and Wilmes' defence during the 2013–2014 trial. Hirsch disputed this, arguing that the false testimonies obscured "many elements" that would "in all likelihood" have brought the original trial to a close in 2014.
Lawyer Georges Pierret surprised the court by requesting a total of 60,000 in legal cost contributions for his client, Guy Stebens: 20,000 from the state, and 20,000 each from Wilmes and Scheer.
The state, meanwhile, has requested only a symbolic 1. Pierret argued that the state – specifically the public prosecutor's office – is responsible for...
KUALA LUMPUR: The sessions court here has fixed Jan 20 to decide on former Perlis menteri besar Azlan Man’s false claims and money laundering cases over return flight tickets and hotel stays. Judg...