Here are three closely related facts about the 2020 U.S. presidential election: why claims of widespread fraud have failed in court; what has happened to the lawyers who pursued those claims’ and why this information is not more visible in major news cycles.
First, despite dozens of lawsuits filed across multiple states, no court found verifiable evidence of fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the election. Judges repeatedly ruled that the allegations were unsupported by reliable, admissible evidence. Many claims relied on speculation, hearsay, or misinterpretation of data rather than documented proof. Courts require concrete, verifiable evidence and a clear connection between alleged wrongdoing and enough affected votes to alter results. That standard was not met in any case.
Second, lawyers who brought frivolous or baseless lawsuits have faced significant professional consequences. Some were sanctioned by federal courts and ordered to pay legal fees or undergo additional legal education. Others were referred to state bar disciplinary authorities. High-profile figures associated with these claims have been suspended or disbarred, and some have faced civil liability or criminal charges related to broader efforts to overturn the election. These outcomes reflect enforcement of long-standing ethical rules that prohibit attorneys from filing claims without factual and legal foundation.
Third, these developments receive limited sustained media attention for structural...
Russian forces are likely fabricating claims of a Ukrainian "counteroffensive" near the Dnipropetrovsk-Zaporizhzhia regional borders to cover up earlier false reports about their own advances in t...