The following is part of Greenberg Traurig’s ongoing series analyzing cross-border data transfers in light of the new Standard Contractual Clauses approved by the European Commission in June 2021.
Background. Company A is an EEA controller that utilizes Company Z, a processor based in Country Q. Company Z does not have a legal presence in Country R,but does have an employee that is on a personal vacation in Country R and receives personal information while on vacation.
Transfer 1: SCC Module 2. The cross-border transfer of personal data from the EEA to Country Q should utilize the SCC Module 2 designed for transfers from a controller to a non-EEA processor.
Transfer 2: No Mechanism Needed. The EDPB has suggested that when a company transmits personal data to an employee that is located outside of the EEA the transmission does not constitute a “transfer” of personal information for purposes of Chapter V of the GDPR because the data has not been sent to a separate controller or processor.[1] While the EDPB provided, as an example, the use-case whereby an employee travels for work to India where he or she remotely accesses personal data from the EEA, this rationale presumably also applies to other remote-work situations such as where an employee goes on a personal vacation in a non-EEA country, or where the remote employee downloads personal data (as opposed to remotely accessing such data). Although the example provided by the EDPB also involved a European company...
A whistleblower that received a share of the US government’s $150 million False Claims Act settlement with Walgreen Co. and Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. couldn’t convince a federal court to rule ...