On February 16, 2022, Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss a putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against a videoconferencing company and certain of its executives. In re Zoom Sec. Litig., No. 20-cv-02353-JD (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2022). Plaintiff alleged that the company made misrepresentations concerning the level of encryption on its primary videoconferencing product. The Court held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged falsity, scienter, and loss causation as to the CEO’s challenged statements regarding encryption, but it dismissed claims as to certain other alleged misstatements, and all claims against one executive, for failure to sufficiently allege scienter, while granting leave to amend.
The Court first held that plaintiff adequately alleged that the company misrepresented that its primary videoconferencing product offered “end-to-end encryption,” which plaintiff claimed was inaccurate because the company retained the ability to centrally decrypt and access the communications of its end users. Slip op. at 4. The Court rejected the company’s argument that “end-to-end encryption” can have different meanings, emphasizing that defendants’ statements as alleged in the complaint showed otherwise. Id. at 4-5. In particular, the Court pointed to an alleged statement by the company’s CEO apologizing for “incorrectly suggesting” that its product offered “...
We respect your privacy Telewizja Polska S.A. w likwidacji processes your personal data collected when you visit individual websites on the tvp.pl Portal (hereinafter referred to as the Portal), i...