When demand for telemedicine visits surged with the arrival of COVID-19, why were some primary care practices better able to meet the demand than others? A new study in Annals of Internal Medicine identifies four broad reasons behind the difference.
The study’s authors surveyed 25 practice leaders, representing 87 primary care practices in Florida and New York, about their practices’ experiences with implementing telemedicine. Questions were guided by three “frameworks,” including health information technology evaluation, access to care, and health information technology life cycle.
After analyzing the responses, the researchers identified four overarching themes. First was that the ease with which a practice adopted telemedicine depended greatly on its prior experience with virtual health. In scheduling visits, for example, experienced practices knew the importance of grouping telehealth visits together because many doctors have difficulty alternating between face-to-face and telehealth visits.
A second theme was the impact of regulatory differences for telehealth among states, especially in areas such as prescribing controlled substances via telemedicine visits and licensing issues. The study quotes one Florida-based respondent who wrote that licensure had been “a moving target throughout the past year,” and that many of his colleagues had gotten licensed in Georgia so they could treat preexisting patients.
“Such differences can be as basic as differing definitions of...
Park Filed Complaint Against President Lee Ahead of 2021 Election Jang Youngha Sentenced to One Year in Prison, Two Years Probation Confirmed The police have launched an investigation into Park Chu...