You've likely heard about the latest term to enter the workplace zeitgeist - "quiet quitting" - from any number of sources, including the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. Advocates of "quiet quitting" are largely rebranding and advancing a rallying cry that has, of course, existed for much longer than the last few weeks: that workers should say "no" to additional work without additional pay, and/or not take on additional duties outside of workers' job descriptions. Many detractors view this concept as simply "phoning it in," noting that a lack of commitment will hurt workers' chances for advancement or impact their performance in their current roles. Regardless of one's feelings about this cultural moment (or its staying power in light of economic uncertainty), one must acknowledge the national conversation.
Employers may feel distressed after reading such articles. Managers may picture remote workers twiddling their thumbs at home or emboldened workers doodling in their cubicles while on the clock. But perceptive managers and executives should avoid viewing workers' concerns as nefarious. Instead, employers may want to take a moment to level-set with their employees to ensure mutually beneficial relationships.
The "quiet quitting" concept is reportedly taking hold in large part because workers are trying to re-draw work-life boundaries following the pandemic, the Great Resignation, return-to-office pushes, inflation woes, and other recent...
AIDS Healthcare Foundation will pay $1.44 million to resolve allegations that it violated federal law by submitting false or invalid codes to inflate payments from the Medicare Advantage program. ...