Israar Ahmed’s recent opinion piece, “Open the Discussion on Occupied Palestine,” does anything but open meaningful discussion on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Instead, it demonizes Israel and Zionism and demands that Yale and the News condemn them. Ahmed’s unilaterally damning approach leads to grave errors in his assessment of the conflict and, worse, a counterproductive vision of what Yale’s students and institutions should do about it.
Ahmed’s statement that “Israel has continuously bombed the Gaza strip” leaves out necessary context: much of Israel’s military action in Gaza in recent years has been prompted by terrorism or threats of impending terrorism against Israel’s citizens. Ahmed omits that the purpose of the operation carried out in Gaza in August was to neutralize the terror group Islamic Jihad, which was threatening to launch rockets from Gaza at Israeli civilians.
Equally unfair is his comparison of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Israel’s occupation of the West Bank: Russia’s invasion was unprompted, while Israel’s actions in 1948 and 1967 were a response to invasion by all of its neighbors. In both arguments, oversimplification of the conflict into a one-sided one loses sight of key nuance.
Ahmed wants Yale, the News and you to condemn “the Israeli occupation.” But what exactly is he referring to by “occupation?” Is it the West Bank, the Golan Heights or the Gaza Strip (which is not, in fact, occupied by Israel)? Or is the whole of Israel occupied...
Kolkata: Kolkata Police has been grappling with a fresh challenge since the past week — controlling fake news. While it initially started with fake circulars, beginning with "restrictions" on cert...