Overtime clauses are a near-universal feature of modern employment contracts in South Africa, typically framed in broad terms requiring employees to work overtime “as and when needed.” While such clauses appear to provide employers with operational flexibility, their legal enforceability is far from absolute. This article examines the statutory framework governing overtime, interrogates the enforceability of standard contractual clauses, and evaluates recent jurisprudence, with particular reference to AMCU obo Mkohonto & others v ANDRU Mining & others.
It is argued that, contrary to common employer assumptions, overtime clauses are frequently unenforceable due to statutory limitations, interpretative challenges, and the requirement of ongoing consent.
The regulation of working time in South Africa is primarily governed by the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (BCEA). Section 9 establishes the threshold for “ordinary hours of work,” limiting employees to:
Any time worked beyond these limits constitutes overtime. Crucially, section 10(1)(a) of the BCEA provides that an employer may not require or permit an employee to work overtime except in accordance with an agreement. This provision introduces a foundational principle: overtime is consensual, not compulsory.
Although the BCEA does not require overtime agreements to be in...
Russian military command has been lying for the fifth month in a row about battlefield “successes,” claiming that Russian forces are advancing west of Kupiansk in the Kharkiv region. However, this...