Companies cannot rely on their own definition of “usual and customary” when determining prices to reimburse federal drug programs, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday in a whistleblower case brought under the False Claims Act.
“There are probably a lot of disappointed defense lawyers today,” said Phillips & Cohen partner Stephen Hasegawa in a statement sent shortly after the opinion was released in Schutte v. SuperValu.
Want to continue reading?
Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!
Benefits of a Digital Membership
- Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
- Access to the entire ALM network of websites
- Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
- Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
- Search by a wide range of topics
Already have an account? https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMifGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmxhdy5jb20vbmF0aW9u...