×
Saturday, May 2, 2026

Whistleblowers crucial in exposing truth in Roberts-Smith trial - Independent Australia

Whistleblowers understand networks. Whistleblowers are scapegoated by them. When whistleblowers prevail, it is often because one network takes on another. The case of Ben Roberts-Smith is such a case.

Truth is the bystander.

War legitimises murder. When I first read my grandfather’s diary from the Western Front in World War I, I read of an implied legitimacy to kill or be killed. They were not war criminals, but they still engaged in murder. The real criminals were those who had authorised the war.

The orchestrators of war rarely fire a shot; and more rarely are they prosecuted for their crimes. Take for example the case of Henry Kissinger who recently celebrated his 100th birthday. Kissinger is widely regarded as a war criminal. He advised Nixon to bomb Cambodia, leading to the dissolution of that country and to the rise of the Khmer Rouge. Kissinger was responsible for more civilian deaths in Cambodia than previously known, according to an archive of U.S. military documents and interviews with Cambodian survivors.

Kissinger bears significant responsibility for the attacks in Cambodia that killed as many as 150,000 civilians. Kissinger’s crimes did not stop there. He derailed the Vietnamese peace talks in 1972 to help Nixon get re-elected, only to accept the Nobel Peace Prize for himself in 1973.

Ben Roberts-Smith: The breaking of a plaster saint

The dismissal of Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation case has reverberating consequences, reports Dr Binoy Kampmark.

He played a...



Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMieGh0dHBzOi8vaW5kZXBlbmRlbnRhdXN0cmFs...