Act lawsuit, arguing he sufficiently alleged the defense contractor illegally billed the U. S. government instead of the Australian Navy for work under an existing contract. James Steurt argued in a brief filed Tuesday that a New Jersey federal judge applied too strict an analysis when dismissing his lawsuit against the Florida-based company. The information Steurt provided, and his claims that L3Harris knew or should have known about wrongfully billing the U. S. for research and development costs under its existing contract with the Australian Navy, are more than enough to. . .
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
ST. GEORGE, Utah (ABC4) — A Utah podiatrist and two nurses have been federally indicted on fraud charges after they allegedly submitted fraudulent claims to Medicare for skin substitute services, ...