The gig giant said a car did the work, not the person - the court wasn't buying it
DoorDash owes Washington roughly $14.5 million after a state appeals court upheld a ruling that its Dashers count as covered workers for industrial insurance.
On July 28, 2026, the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division II, affirmed the assessment and sided with the state Department of Labor and Industries. The ruling closes off a familiar argument used by companies that lean on independent contractors, and it lands in territory HR and workforce leaders watch closely.
Here is what happened. Between July 2017 and December 2019, roughly 26,500 Dashers made about 8.9 million deliveries across the state. DoorDash paid no industrial insurance premiums for any of them. The Department audited the company and concluded it owed roughly $14.5 million in taxes and penalties.
Industrial insurance is Washington's version of workers' compensation. Under the Industrial Insurance Act, employers pay quarterly premiums for anyone who counts as a "worker." State law defines a worker as someone under a contract "the essence of which is his or her personal labor." That phrase drove the case.
Both sides agreed the Dashers were independent contractors. Below, a judge, the Board, and a superior court all found the essence of the work was personal labor - so the Dashers were covered. DoorDash had argued the opposite: that the essence was the vehicle, not the person. Because Dashers "had to, of necessity, utilize a...
False. The quotes attributed to the politicians have been fabricated by a foreign-run disinformation operation. AAP FactCheck - Pauline Hanson and Anthony Albanese did not trade barbs during a liv...