Ealing Council as the corporate made their false claims regarding a breach of bail conditions, which Errol Baptiste allege which was untrue and defamatory, he describe as a legal recourse under the Defamation Act 2013.
Ealing Council in their defamatory statement falsely prosecuting Errol Baptiste under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 abuse the process as defamation, harassment, intimidating, retaliation, vexatious, and victimization by calling him a liar on the housing disrepair described as a serial harasser being defamatory, libellous, and slanderous under the Defamation Act 2013.
Ealing Council caused serious harm with malicious prosecution against Errol Baptiste for alleged criminal offences under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 at Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court on two occasions on June 21, 2024, and October 22, 2024, which he was acquitted after 120 days later and the prosecution representing Ealing Council offered no evidence.
Errol Baptiste have evidence of serious harm caused by Ealing Council’s wrongdoing in their failure to deal with the housing disrepairs since November 2021 and failing to offer him a decant. Ealing Council in their defamatory presented Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court in their false claims that Errol Baptiste the defendant allegedly contacted the 3 individual staff members while he was on bail during August 2024 was untrue as defamatory under the Defamation Act 2013 that Ealing Council lacked serious credibility.
Ealing Council in...
American Psychiatric Centers, doing business as Comprehensive Psychiatric Services, agreed to pay $2.75 million to resolve allegations it submitted false claims for psychotherapy services to govern...