Employment contracts typically guarantee employment for a definite period of a time absent “cause,” “good cause,” “just cause,” or the like. Sometimes the “cause” standard specifies particular misconduct and a minimum level of culpability, such as “gross negligence” or “recklessness.” Sometimes the “cause” standard is left undefined. Either way, these provisions leave open a critical issue: the relevance, if any, of the employer’s honesty, good faith and evenhandedness in applying the “cause” standard.
Surprisingly, the New York case law on this point is a mixed bag. This article analyzes the conflicting case law to help employer-side and employee-side counsel avoid a blind spot.
Objective Versus Subjective ‘Cause’ Standards
Want to continue reading?
Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!
Benefits of a Digital Membership
- Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
- Access to the entire ALM network of websites
- Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
- Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
- Search by a wide range of topics
Already have an account?
Read Full Story:
https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmxhdy5jb20vbmV3eW9y...