On August 25, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in which it held that ex parte patent prosecutions by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) qualify as “other Federal . . . hearing[s]” under prong (ii) of the False Claims Act’s Public Disclosure Bar. In so ruling, the Ninth Circuit affirmed that the Public Disclosure Bar should not be read in a restrictive manner but should be given a broad construction.

The relator in the case, U.S. ex rel. Silbersher v. Allergan, Inc., is a patent attorney who alleged that the defendant pharmaceutical companies unlawfully obtained patents on two Alzheimer’s drugs, which allegedly prevented generic versions from coming to market and thus increased the prices Medicaid paid for the drugs. However, the Ninth Circuit recognized that “the key factual information underlying [the relator’s] complaint was all publicly disclosed and much could be found in websites maintained by the PTO and other government agencies.”

The Public Disclosure Bar, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4)(A), prevents False Claims Act lawsuits based on information publicly disclosed:

1. 1. in a Federal criminal, civil, or administrative hearing in which the Government or its agent is a party;
   2. in a congressional, Government Accountability Office, or other Federal report, hearing, audit, or investigation; or
   3. from the news media.

The question presented to the Ninth Circuit was whether the ex parte patent prosecutions that disclosed the information underlying...

Read Full Story: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/ninth-circuit-affirms-broad-scope-of-5059473/