Stefon Diggs is back in the legal spotlight, and the fight is getting more tangled by the week. The Washington Commanders wide receiver has again denied serious allegations from a social media influencer, and the case now includes dueling claims over what was said online.
In his latest court response, the football star rejected the account given by influencer Christopher Griffith and held firm that he did nothing wrong. His position also includes an argument that he cannot be held liable for a social media post, because he maintains it contained no false statements.
Those are legal arguments, not rulings. No judge has decided the underlying claims, and nothing in the case has been proven so far.
The case arrives at a sensitive time for an athlete with a high profile, where every filing is dissected by fans and commentators.
Earlier, the receiver responded to Griffith publicly on social media and accused him of lying. Diggs then filed a defamation lawsuit alleging the influencer harmed his reputation with false claims. That libel suit was filed on Oct. 1, 2025, and it seeks unspecified damages along with attorneys’ fees.
Griffith answered with counterclaims of his own, alleging that he was defamed by a post the athlete shared after the lawsuit was filed. The post used heated language directed at him, and it has become the center of that part of the case. Griffith is represented by an attorney in...
Is there really a shortage of lower-denomination notes? A recent fake circular has spread misinformation claiming that 10, 20 and 50 currency notes are facing a shortage. The Reserve Bank of India...