A sales director hires an EOR to put someone on payroll in a country the company has no legal entity in, and the conversation about risk usually ends there. The contract is signed, the local statutory benefits are handled, the payslip goes out on time, and everyone moves on to the next hire. That’s the pitch every employer of record platform makes, and for the ordinary case, an engineer, a support rep, a marketer doing their job from a home office, it holds up.
It stops holding up the moment the person you hired can sign a contract on your behalf, close a deal, or effectively run a country office. Tax authorities call this a permanent establishment, and it’s the single biggest gap in how HR teams reason about EOR risk. The EOR shields the employment relationship. It does not automatically shield the company from a foreign government deciding it has a taxable presence in that country because of what the employee does there in practice.
Permanent establishment rules are old, but they were not built with remote-first hiring in mind. A country’s tax authority can assess corporate income tax, penalties, and back-dated filings once it decides your employee’s activity crosses the line from “working for a foreign company” to “generating revenue on our soil.” The line is about function, not payroll mechanics. An EOR-employed engineer writing code rarely trips it. An EOR-employed country manager negotiating and signing deals with local customers very often does, regardless of who...
U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) said Monday that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s claim that a ship was struck by mines in the Strait of Hormuz was false, Ynet Global reported. CENTCOM wrote on X ...