The Post’s commentaries on Jackson are not only patently false but their phony claims about her confirmation hearing deserve endless taunting.
The Washington Post, which led the 2018 Democrat effort to destroy Brett Kavanaugh’s life by falsely accusing him of serial gang rape, now claims asking Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson questions about her judicial record is worse.
The WaPo Editorial Board, whose deputy editorial page editor Ruth Marcus wrote a book smearing Kavanaugh, argued on Wednesday that Republican questioning on Jackson’s radical track record, lenience on child porn offenders, and lack of willingness to define “woman” or state when life begins is “egregious behavior” that far outweighs its months-long campaign against Kavanaugh.
The Washington Post article is built around demonstrably false claims that Christine Blasey Ford “credibly accused Mr. Kavanaugh of sexual assault” and that “Republicans have done the most damage” to the SCOTUS confirmation process and the nominees involved. These spurious claims could not be further from the truth.
In a last-ditch attempt to prevent the Trump nominee from joining the court, the Washington Post published a series of tendentious and inaccurate stories laying forth Christine Blasey Ford’s unsubstantiated rape allegations against Kavanaugh.
WaPo ran the baseless stories after Blasey Ford threatened to take her tip line submission to The New York Times if she did not receive a quick enough response. When a sex crimes...
Renowned human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, SAN, has criticised President Bola Tinubu for relying on claims by United States President Donald Trump regarding the reported killing of senior Islamic ...